← Team Portal
Internal Only
Sell-Side Advisory · Client Memorandum
Emanay Advisors
1221 Brickell Ave, Suite 900
Miami, FL 33131
legal@emanay.io · emanay.io
Document Reference
EMA-MEMO-SPRINT-004
Date
August 19, 2026
Prepared By
Emanay Inc.
Delivered To
Dani Gergel
Privileged & Confidential
Deal Life Cycle Memo — Complete Engagement History
Project Sprint — The Gergel Group, LLCDeal Life Cycle Memo — November 2024 to Present
All Shoes Nation · T&D Trades, LLC · Companion to the Expense Memorandum (EMA-EXP-SPRINT-001) and the Statement of Account (EMA-SOA-SPRINT-001)
From
Emanay Inc.
dba Emanay Advisors · Sell-Side Advisory
1221 Brickell Ave, Suite 900, Miami FL 33131
Contact: Alexandre R.J. Camus, Founder & MD
alex@emanay.io
To
Dani Gergel
The Gergel Group, LLC (d/b/a All Shoes Nation)
Re: The complete record of your sell-side engagement, from the November 2024 engagement letter through today

This memorandum is the complete history of Project Sprint — every buyer, every material work product, and every milestone from the engagement letter forward. It is longer and more detailed than prior status memos by design: it is meant to stand on its own as the full record, ahead of a Timeline & Expense Memorandum and a Statement of Account that will follow it.

This is nearly a 21-month engagement, not a few months of 2026 marketing. It includes a full buyer cycle with Ryan Gnesin (Elevate Capital Holdings) that reached an executed Letter of Intent in September 2025, a first outreach campaign that contacted 1,728 buyers by mid-2025 and produced just 6 NDAs, a Valuation Report ($12.2M, June 2025) and a Lender Underwriting Feasibility Report produced in 2025, the February–June 2026 accounting rebuild that produced the current Quality of Earnings, and a second, better-converting 2026 buyer marketing wave that has produced 23 signed NDAs to date. Every section below is sourced to specific correspondence, meeting notes, platform records, or internal reports.
Contents
01 — Executive SummaryWhere things stand today
02 — Company & Engagement OriginNov 2024
03 — The Ryan Gnesin Buyer CycleDec 2024 – Sep 2025
04 — Valuation & Feasibility Work Product2025
04A — CapForge — Complete Work History2025
04B — Instances of Emanay Covering Client CostsJul 2025, Jun 2026
05 — Interim Marketing PeriodOct 2025 – Jan 2026
06 — The Accounting Rebuild & QoEFeb – Jun 2026
07 — Current Deal EconomicsPer Jun 2026 QoE
08 — Related-Party ConsiderationsOngoing
09 — Buyer Funnel: Two Distinct CampaignsDec 2024 – Present
10 — Materials Produced & In Current UseFull index
11 — Deal Team, Full Roster2024 – 2026
11A — Late 2025 – Early 2026 StatusSep 2025 – Feb 2026
11B — New Broker, Confirmed Materials UseAug 2026
12 — What's Still OutstandingNext steps
01
Executive Summary

Project Sprint began with the engagement letter you signed on November 2, 2024. Within weeks, All Shoes Nation was listed on Axial, a sell-side marketplace, and the first serious buyer — Ryan Gnesin of Elevate Capital Holdings — signed an NDA on December 4, 2024. Over the following ten months, that relationship moved through a full diligence cycle, an in-person visit, a Valuation Report, a Lender Underwriting Feasibility Report, a non-binding LOI, and ultimately an executed Letter of Intent on September 17, 2025. The deal did not close from there — the record shows the process stalled shortly after, when a financial discrepancy in the post-LOI numbers was flagged.

Marketing continued through the rest of 2025 with several additional prospective buyers. In February 2026, Emanay formally took over your full accounting file, which led to a ground-up rebuild of your financials, culminating in the June 29, 2026 Quality of Earnings — now the sole financial source of truth for the deal. Marketing on the same Axial listing has continued into 2026, with 23 signed NDAs to date and active conversations ongoing.

Engagement Length
~21mo
Nov 2024 to present
Buyers Engaged to Date
10+
NDA-signed, named parties
Current Ask
$7.5M
Per Jun 2026 QoE
02
Company & Engagement Origin
BusinessAll Shoes Nation — Amazon-native footwear and apparel reseller, operating through The Gergel Group, LLC and T&D Trades, LLC.
Engagement LetterExecuted November 2, 2024 — 4% sell-side success fee up to $10M transaction value.
Platform ListingListed on Axial as "E-commerce company specializing in footwear" no later than early December 2024. This is a single continuous listing — on hold at points, reactivated at others — that has run for the entire engagement.
Founding Deal TeamAlexandre Camus (lead), with associates Miles Chiu and Lauchlann Goodall handling early buyer correspondence and diligence support.
03
The Ryan Gnesin Buyer Cycle

Ryan Gnesin, of Elevate Capital Holdings (formerly Elevate Brands, an Amazon FBA aggregator), was the first serious buyer engaged on Project Sprint and the only one to date to reach an executed Letter of Intent. This is the single most fully documented relationship in the deal's history.

3.1
Introduction & Initial Diligence — Dec 2024
Dec 4, 2024
Ryan Gnesin signs the NDA via Axial and requests an introductory call. Milestone
Dec 16–17, 2024
"Elevate Cap x Emanay Re: All Shoes Nation" introductory call — Alexandre introduces Dani; Ryan shares his background and experience with Elevate Brands' Amazon rollups.
Dec 23–28, 2024
Lauchlann Goodall sends Ryan a full due-diligence question list and detailed answers, with Miles Chiu supporting — the initial financial and operating model discussion for the deal.
3.2
Site Visit & Continued Diligence — Q1–Q2 2025
Mar 31 – Apr 8, 2025
Ryan travels for an in-person meeting with Dani.
Apr 14–19, 2025
Post-visit follow-up — Ryan remains engaged, flags valuation as "a bit high," and requests accrual-basis financials.
May 9, 2025
Consolidated accrual-basis financials delivered.
3.3
Financial Refinement & Lender Preparation — Summer 2025
Jul 14–15, 2025
The Lender Underwriting Feasibility Report is discussed — see Section 04 for full detail on this work product and its cost.
Jul 25 – Aug 6, 2025
Adjusted-numbers cycle with Ryan — average adjusted EBITDA established at that time was $1.79M (well below the figure the 2026 QoE later established). Ryan repeatedly requests a personal-expense-free balance sheet to properly assess working capital.
Aug 14, 2025
Dave Rosati is brought in for legal support. Parallel SBA lender outreach begins with Magna Capital Funding, eCommerce Lending Inc., and LiveOak Bank.
3.4
LOI Negotiation & Execution — Aug–Sep 2025
Aug 18, 2025
Ryan submits a non-binding LOI. Milestone
Aug 20, 2025
Dani provides detailed LOI comments: a 2M EBITDA × 3.5x structure, non-compete carve-outs preserving the B2B/Gelty business, and a stock-purchase structure to preserve QSBS treatment.
Sep 8, 2025
"ASN Discussion" call — indicative structure: $6M price / $600K buyer cash / $1M seller note / $4.4M SBA loan.
Sep 17, 2025
Executed LOI delivered to Ryan. Milestone — highest point reached in this cycle
3.5
Post-LOI Diligence & Stall — Sep 2025
Sep 18–19, 2025
Updated post-LOI financials are sent. Ryan identifies a significant discrepancy: "average net income margin over past 4 years is 13% and now these figures show 2025 net income margin at 41%."
Sep 22–29, 2025
Diligence continues on COGS accuracy (historical average 84.6% vs. inconsistent 2025 figures). This is the last substantive documented exchange with Ryan in this record.

The correspondence available to us does not include a formal notice of withdrawal or termination from either side. What is documented is that the deal did not proceed past this point, and that a real, unresolved discrepancy in the financials was the last substantive issue raised before activity stopped.

04
Valuation & Feasibility Work Product

Two significant work products were built to support buyer and lender conversations during the Ryan Gnesin cycle:

4.1
Valuation Report — All Shoes Nation
BuiltBeginning May 2, 2025, using an internal template; finalized around an "ASN Valuation Report" working session on May 28, 2025 involving Miles Chiu, Lauchlann Goodall, and Alex Liang.
ContentInitially discussed against a $10,000,000 target; the finished report's actual conclusion, per the Jul 14, 2025 Comprehensive Strategic Update, was $12.2M post-DLOM (Discount for Lack of Marketability), dated June 2025. Folded into the CIM and confirmed complete in correspondence with Axial on June 18, 2025.
Actual Market Positioning vs. ValuationDespite the $12.2M valuation-report conclusion, the business was actively priced in the market at $6M + inventory (~$9M total, ~4.4x EBITDA) as of Jul 2025 — a substantial discount to Emanay's own valuation work, and buyers still cited valuation as a reason to pass (Section 09.1). This is a materially different, more aggressive pricing posture than a simple reading of "$10M target" would suggest.
Payment StatusNo separate invoice or payment for this report has been located. It appears to have been produced as part of ongoing engagement work rather than billed as a discrete deliverable.
4.2
Lender Underwriting Feasibility Report
PurposePrepared to support presentation of the opportunity to SBA-backed lenders on Ryan's behalf. Per the official proposal's Executive Summary: "a lender-facing, DSCR-driven analysis of the transaction — validating cash flow coverage, capital structure soundness, and sponsor readiness," intended as a core component of the financing submission package for SBA and alternative lenders.
Official Proposal — SentMon, Jul 14, 2025, 10:29 AM — "Emanay Services Agreement: Underwriting Feasibility Report" — the formal proposal document, distinct from and sent alongside the same-day correspondence discussing the $15K-to-$7.5K price reduction.
Confirmed Fee StructureFlat fee: $7,500.00, structured as $3,750 due upon execution of the engagement and $3,750 deferred to completion. Note: "for expedited services, 100% of the total fee is due upon execution." This resolves the earlier "$15,000 reduced to $7,500" framing found in chat correspondence — $7,500 was the actual, final quoted flat fee, not a further-reduced figure.
Scope of WorkDSCR Modeling & Feasibility Analysis (3-year pro forma DSCR forecast, interest-only and fully amortizing loan modeling, sensitivity testing, break-even analysis); Buyer Profile & Underwriting Support (sponsor liquidity/net worth review, buyer financials review, creditworthiness positioning); Capital Structure & Asset-Level Analysis (capital stack summary, LTV overview, working capital commentary); Transaction Narrative & Lender Summary (deal overview, use of funds, transaction structure flowchart, lender positioning).
Final Deliverables & TimelineInvestment banking-grade Feasibility Report (PDF) plus an editable Excel DSCR Model. Initial draft: 3–5 business days from final buyer/seller inputs. Final version: 1 business day after comments.
Signature StatusThe proposal document includes a signature line for Dani Gergel, Founder, but the copy on file does not show it executed. Whether this was separately signed via PandaDoc (as the proposal's "Next Steps" section describes) has not been confirmed.
Payment StatusNot confirmed. No follow-up correspondence locating a payment for either the $3,750 upfront installment or the full $7,500 has been found. This is a separate figure from the "$25K" Dani referenced in the same-day chat thread — see note below.
On the "$25,000" FigureDani's statement "I just invested 25k on report that most of chances is wrong" does not refer to this Feasibility Report. Read in context ("once I finish the capforge analyze... my report is ready"), it appears to reference a prior cost tied to the CapForge financial analysis/cleanup — confirmed elsewhere as the Apr 8, 2025 CapForge payment (Section 04A.2). These are two different work products and should not be conflated in any billing document.
Separate Emanay Cost ClaimIn the same thread, Alex states Emanay had "already come out of pocket $10,000 on valuation work alone + costs of running your deal." This is Emanay's self-reported internal cost, not a payment made by Dani, and is a third, distinct figure from both the $25K and the $7,500 report price.
A third document — "Project Sprint - Financial & Valuation Sprint (01052025)" — was requested to be located specifically. It was not found under this name in the correspondence reviewed. The closest match, a "Phase I Financial & Valuation Sprint" signed proposal, belongs to a different, unrelated Emanay client engagement (dated January 2026). If this document exists for Project Sprint, please confirm its file name and source so it can be properly located and reflected here.
04A
CapForge — Complete Work History

CapForge Bookkeeping, Tax & More was Dani's outside bookkeeper prior to Emanay's February 2026 accounting take-over, and did substantial, ongoing work across nearly the entire Ryan Gnesin buyer cycle. This work has not been fully credited in prior memos and is documented here in full.

4A.1
Scope of Work Performed
Ongoing BookkeepingMonthly close for both The Gergel Group, LLC and T&D Trades, LLC, spanning at minimum Feb 2025 through the Feb 2026 handoff to Emanay Accounting.
Cash vs. Accrual ReconciliationExtended work resolving discrepancies between cash-basis and accrual-basis reporting, directly addressed in a dedicated 54-minute working session on April 30, 2025 ("CapForge x All Shoes Re: Report") with Matt Remuzzi, covering inventory, prepaid expenses, and personal-expense treatment.
Personal/Business Expense SeparationDetailed separation of Dani's personal expenses from business EBITDA (Sep 2025), including coordination directly with Merrill Lynch (Neil Mehta) to reconcile investment account treatment.
Valuation GuidanceIn the April 30, 2025 session, Matt Remuzzi and Alex jointly advised Dani on typical e-commerce valuation multiples — 6–7x net operating income was discussed at that time (a different basis than the 3.5x PF Adjusted EBITDA multiple later used in the 2026 QoE-anchored ask; these are not directly comparable without normalizing for methodology).
Consolidation Error CorrectionIdentified and corrected a spreadsheet formula error that had produced a ~$500K discrepancy between consolidated and separate-entity 2024 net profit figures (Jul 2025).
Buyer Diligence SupportDirectly fielded due-diligence requests from Ryan Gnesin (Aug–Sep 2025), including monthly P&L/balance sheet detail, inventory purchase detail, and COGS-per-SKU data.
New Project Scope (Apr–Aug 2025)A distinct, separately-scoped "New CapForge Project" covering Shopify, Poshmark, and Capital One statement reconciliation for the Apr–Aug 2025 period.
4A.2
CapForge Billing & Payment
Confirmed Payment — Apr 8, 2025$25,000.00 (Receipt #1431-3702, Visa -9583, 2:12:55 PM) — the largest single payment to CapForge across the engagement, made just before the intensive Apr–Aug 2025 cleanup and reconciliation work described above. This is almost certainly the "25k on report" Dani referenced in his Jul 14, 2025 message.
Confirmed Payment — Aug 29, 2025$4,630.00 (Receipt #1482-6643, Visa -4161, 8:08:56 AM; also invoice #166493). Combined with the April payment, total confirmed CapForge payment is $29,630.00 — closely matching Dani's own Sep 25, 2025 statement that "we paid them 30k."
Revenue-Share / Remit ArrangementA Sep–Oct 2025 email shows Alex asking Matt Remuzzi to "remit the portion of the most recent ASN invoice to me" — indicating some form of referral or revenue-share arrangement between Emanay and CapForge on this account. Matt's reply ("I'd prefer to wait until the project is complete") suggests this was not yet settled. The terms of this arrangement are not documented elsewhere and should be clarified before any statement of account references CapForge fees.
04B
Instances of Emanay Covering Client Costs

Two distinct, dated instances in the correspondence show Alex/Emanay explicitly covering or deferring costs on Dani's behalf, rather than billing them immediately. Both are laid out here with their actual figures — not combined or estimated.

4B.1
July 2025 — Valuation Work & Feasibility Report

Per the Jul 14, 2025 correspondence (Section 04.2): Alex stated Emanay had "already come out of pocket $10,000 on valuation work alone + costs of running your deal," separate from the Lender Underwriting Feasibility Report itself (quoted at $15,000, reduced to $7,500, with $3,750 stated as payable immediately). No payment confirmation for either figure has been located.

4B.2
June 2026 — Accounting Invoice Dispute

The clearest, most fully documented cost-coverage instance in the record. Per the Fathom recap of the June 8, 2026 "Dani x Alex" call:

ItemDetail
Original Disputed Invoice$9,500 — contested by Dani, citing unexpected monthly fees ($1,125/entity) and inclusion of March services he did not expect to be billed for
Amount Dani Agreed to Pay$4,500 — for April & May accounting
Covered by Alex/EmanayMarch accounting services — absorbed rather than billed
Deferred to Closing$500 historical cleanup fee
June InvoiceTo be paid in July, after month-end close
Stated JustificationThe fee was framed as covering a full CFO (Richard Sanchez) and CPA (Evan Chandonnet, working with BDO) for buyer/lender calls, not bookkeeping alone
Cumulative Cost Covered by Alex, as of this call"~$14,000 in costs to date" — Alex's own stated figure on this call, not itemized further in this recap
This $14,000 figure is distinct from the $10,000 valuation-work figure cited a year earlier (Jul 2025) — they should not be added together without confirming whether one includes the other. Given the year-long gap and different framing ("valuation work" vs. general "costs to date"), they most likely represent two separate tallies, but this has not been confirmed against any internal ledger.
4B.3
The Confirmed, Ultimate Billed Client Amount

Of every figure discussed across this entire engagement, the one amount with a clear agreement and a clear payment obligation on the record is $4,500 — the April/May 2026 accounting invoice Dani explicitly agreed to pay on the June 8, 2026 call, following the $9,500 dispute. This is confirmed paid per the invoice correspondence in the billing chronology. Every other figure in this section — the $10K, the $14K, the $7,500/$3,750 feasibility report, and the CapForge $4,630 — is either an internal cost claim, a quoted-but-unconfirmed price, or a payment to a third party rather than to Emanay, and should be treated accordingly in the Statement of Account.

05
Interim Marketing Period
Oct 1, 2025
Buyer referral from Randy Woodruff (Bridgepoint Brokerage).
Oct 28, 2025
CIM and data room shared with a new prospective buyer after NDA execution.
Nov 30, 2025
Additional buyer outreach.
Dec 11, 2025
Internal note referencing a deal "given the green light for LOI and diligence," with a buyer's own draft LOI attached.
06
The Accounting Rebuild & Quality of Earnings
Feb 2–6, 2026Emanay formally takes over your full accounting file, framed as urgent support to finalize 2025 financials for a renewed sale process.
Mar 17, 2026"Project Sprint" is used as the working codename for this deal for the first time.
Apr 17–19, 2026First full EBITDA bridge built.
May 27, 2026CIM content review finds and corrects material issues — inaccurate distributor claims, an outdated brand list, misclassified personal expenses.
Jun 29–30, 2026Final Quality of Earnings delivered — established as the sole financial source of truth for the deal going forward. TTM period runs through May 31, 2026.
Mid-May 2026A third Amazon seller account, "Footwear Inc.," launched — not previously documented in this memo. Per the QoE report: May 2026 reflects only partial-month activity; June 2026 is the first full month. A pro forma adjustment (June 2026 results annualized) was applied across historical periods to illustrate the account's potential impact, separate from the existing Sterling Footwear and Lost Inventory Sales pro forma adjustments already tracked in Section 07.
07
Current Deal Economics
Purchase Price
$7.5M
~3.5x FY25 PF Adj. EBITDA
FY25 PF Adj. EBITDA
$2.12M
Per Jun 29, 2026 QoE
Working Capital Peg
$1.4M
Fixed; inventory at cost −20%

Full capital structure and EBITDA bridge detail are unchanged from the July 2026 Deal Memorandum (EMA-MEMO-SPRINT-003) and are available on request.

08
Related-Party Considerations

As you know from our recent conversations, Emanay Advisors is your sell-side advisor while an Emanay affiliate, through Emanay Ventures, is the contemplated buyer. We want this documented plainly in your complete history, and Alex will continue to walk you through it directly as the process advances toward any LOI.

09
The Complete Buyer Funnel — Two Distinct Campaigns, Not One Cumulative Total

Correction from earlier drafts of this memo: the "937 contacted / 159 teasers / 23 NDAs" figures are not a single lifetime total. A separate internal report — the "Project Sprint - Comprehensive Strategic Update," dated Jul 14, 2025, prepared by Alex and attached to the email that same day proposing the Lender Underwriting Feasibility Report — documents an entirely different, much larger set of numbers for the first outreach wave. The two data sets appear to represent two distinct campaigns, not one running count, and should not be added together without confirming the actual overlap.

9.1
Phase 1 — As of Jul 14, 2025 ("Comprehensive Strategic Update")
MetricFigure
Total buyers contacted1,728
— via Emanay/Axial platform580
— via direct/manual outreach1,148
Teasers/CIMs distributed350+
CIM views183
NDAs signed6
Actively engaged buyers1 (Ryan Gnesin)

This report's own conclusion, quoted directly: "The data is clear: the market is not responding to this opportunity in its current form... after 8+ months of active marketing, the only viable next step is to focus all efforts on closing with the current interested party — Ryan Gnesin — and to commission a lender-facing feasibility report that enables him to secure financing." This is the internal analysis that led directly to the Feasibility Report discussed in Section 04.2.

Named Buyers Who Evaluated and Passed

The report specifically names aggregators who reviewed the opportunity but did not progress past teaser stage: Thrasio, Perch, Razor Group, and SellerX — all well-known Amazon FBA aggregators, a materially larger and more sophisticated set of prospective buyers than anything reflected in the buyer-signatory lists compiled elsewhere in this memo from email search alone.

Documented Reasons Buyers Declined
Operational ConcentrationReliance on a small team, limited management depth
SeasonalityRevenue spikes not spread evenly across the year
Owner DependencyBuyer concerns over transition risk without Dani/Michael
Valuation GapMultiple buyers explicitly declined citing price
9.2
Phase 2 — 2026 QoE-Based Relaunch
MetricFigure
Total contacted937
Teasers sent159
NDAs signed23

The per-contact NDA conversion rate improved substantially between the two phases — roughly 0.35% (6 of 1,728) in Phase 1 versus roughly 2.45% (23 of 937) in Phase 2. This is consistent with the QoE-based CIM rebuild (Section 06) producing meaningfully better-qualified outreach, even at lower volume. Several of the 23 Phase 2 NDA signatories actually signed in the summer of 2025, before the QoE existed — meaning the Phase 2 count itself blends pre- and post-QoE activity on the same ongoing Axial listing:

SignatoryFirmDate Signed
Ryan GnesinElevate Capital HoldingsDec 4, 2024
Paresh PatelSandstone CapitalJul 9, 2025
Disha KDsquare VenturesJul 13, 2025
Matthew DavidovJul 22, 2025
Bjoern MinnierThe Platform Group AGJul 28, 2025
Josh CitronAug 1, 2025
John TucciWealthShift PartnersAug 4, 2025
Avkha Equity HoldingsDominic FosterAug 12, 2025

The Comprehensive Strategic Update states only 6 NDAs signed as of Jul 14, 2025, while five of the eight signatories above are dated Jul 22–Aug 12, 2025 — after that report. This means at least 4 of the "6 as of Jul 14" NDA signatories are not yet identified by name in this memo; the pre-Jul-14 list here is incomplete and should not be read as exhaustive. The remaining 2026 signatories and current active conversations (including a recent prospective buyer, Lauren Chervinsky) are reflected in the July 2026 Deal Memorandum.

10
Materials Produced & In Current Use
Valuation Report (May 2025) — folded into the CIM and used in early buyer conversations.
Lender Underwriting Feasibility Report (Jul 2025) — used to support SBA lender presentations for the Ryan Gnesin deal.
Quality of Earnings (Jun 29, 2026) — the current sole financial source of truth, underlying every 2026 deal document.
CIM, teaser, and Deal Memorandum — current versions built directly on the QoE.
!
"Financial & Valuation Sprint (01052025)" — referenced but not yet located; see Section 04.
11
Deal Team — Full Roster
Alexandre CamusManaging Director — deal lead throughout the full engagement.
Miles ChiuAssociate — buyer correspondence and diligence, Dec 2024; organized the ASN Valuation Report session, May 2025.
Lauchlann GoodallAssociate — drafted the initial due-diligence materials for Ryan Gnesin, Dec 2024; contributed to the Valuation Report, May 2025.
Alex LiangInvestment Banking Intern — built the initial Valuation Report template and supported the May 2025 sessions.
Dave RosatiLegal/structuring — joined Aug 2025 for the Ryan Gnesin LOI; continues on the current related-party and Gelty structuring work.
Ghilan GolzarLender coordination — SBA financing outreach, Aug 2025.
Richard SanchezCFO, Emanay Accounting — built the current EBITDA bridge, 2026.
Evan Chandonnet, CPAQoE preparation, 2026. Per the official ASN-2026-001 invoice: "CPA · QOE Lead," described as a "BDO Executive Alumni" — i.e., not a current BDO employee but a specialized outside contributor, distinct from the core internal Emanay Accounting team (Richard Sanchez, Maria Sinning, Brandon Ortiz).
Brandon Ortiz, Maria SinningEmanay Accounting — bookkeeping and reconciliation, 2026.
Tal AvivYour CPA, AS Wealth Solutions — introduced Jun 2026.
11A
Late 2025 – Early 2026: Where the Process Stood

Between the Ryan Gnesin post-LOI discrepancy (Sep 2025) and the formal accounting take-over (Feb 2026), the deal moved through a slower period worth documenting plainly, since it explains a meaningful gap in momentum.

Sep – Dec 2025Ryan continued to request updated, cleaner financials before proceeding further. Getting those required additional CapForge/accounting work, which meant additional cost — and there was disagreement in this window about how that cost should be structured (paid now vs. deferred to closing).
Dec 2025A revised proposal was discussed for the accounting work needed to keep the Ryan process moving, including a phased payment structure (part upfront, part later). By this point the Ryan Gnesin opportunity did not move forward to a close.
Jan 6, 2026You noted that, over roughly the prior year, total spend on the engagement (marketing, reports, and accounting support combined) had reached approximately $60,000 without a completed sale, and that you wanted assurance that further spend would lead to a result. This is a significant figure and is recorded here as your own stated total at that point in the process.
Feb 2026The engagement moved into the accounting take-over described in Section 06, effectively restarting the process on a new financial foundation (the QoE), which is what has driven the current $7.5M ask.

A separate $7,500 fee, distinct from the 2025 feasibility report figure, was discussed and paid in connection with the February 2026 accounting take-over; a partial refund of this amount was also discussed in the following months. These should be tracked as two separate $7,500 figures — one from mid-2025 (feasibility report, payment status still unconfirmed) and one from early 2026 (accounting take-over, paid, partial refund discussed) — not combined into one.

11B
August 2026: A New Broker, Confirmed Use of Emanay's Materials

As of Aug 24, 2026, Dani appears to be running a parallel or successor sale process through a different brokerage — Tim Mastroberti at Robbins Pellegrino — with a new prospective buyer, Ariel Adler, who is now post-call and submitting a formal pre-LOI data request.

Confirmed Materials UseAriel Adler's data request quotes figures directly from both the CIM ("The CIM shows FY2025 revenue of $13.06M") and the QoE (the pro forma adjustment methodology, the Gelty change-of-control gap, the EBITDA addback categories, and the IP matter in non-recurring expenses) — both Emanay work product, one a named Deliverable, the other Working Papers under the engagement letter (Appendix A, §6.1).
New Buyer StatusAriel Adler does not appear in Emanay's tracked buyer funnel (Section 09) — no record of prior contact, teaser, or NDA. If confirmed as genuinely new and independently sourced, he likely does not qualify as a "Transaction Source" under the Agreement's definition, which affects the strength of the 12-month success-fee tail specifically for this buyer (see the Materials Ownership & Success Fee Tail memo, EMA-LEGAL-SPRINT-001).
A Notable Catch by the BuyerAriel Adler independently flagged the same CIM-vs-QoE revenue basis inconsistency documented internally in this engagement — the CIM shows gross revenue ($13.06M) while the QoE shows net-of-discounts revenue ($10.94M pro forma adjusted). A sophisticated buyer caught this on their own during diligence.
New Operational Detail SurfacedThe data request also reveals: gross margin compression from ~31% to ~26% (2024→2025); T&D Trades "Unapplied Cash" accounting entries ($399K FY2025, $753K 2026 YTD) requiring QoE reconciliation; and a question about whether Michael, Shai, and Blesson (the three-person operating team) are even aware the business is for sale.
This should be escalated to Legal immediately, not treated as a documentation matter. See EMA-LEGAL-SPRINT-001 for the full materials-ownership and outstanding-payment analysis, now updated to reflect this confirmed event.
12
What's Still Outstanding
1
Confirm the "Financial & Valuation Sprint (01052025)" document — not located under this name; please share the source if available.
2
Confirm payment status on the actual Feasibility Report price ($7,500, $3,750 upfront) — not the $25K figure, which refers to a separate, prior cost. No payment confirmation for either the report or Emanay's claimed $10K out-of-pocket valuation cost has been located.
3
Timeline & Expense Memorandum — to follow this document, itemizing hours and costs across the full engagement.
4
Statement of Account — to follow the Timeline & Expense Memorandum, reconciling amounts paid to date against amounts owed.
5
Clarify the Emanay/CapForge revenue-share arrangement — Alex's Sep 2025 request to "remit the portion of the most recent ASN invoice" implies a referral or split-fee arrangement never fully documented.
6
Reconcile the $10K (Jul 2025) and $14K (Jun 2026) cost-coverage figures — confirm whether these overlap before using either in the Statement of Account.
7
Confirm the two separate $7,500 fees are not the same fee — one from Jul 2025 (feasibility report, unconfirmed as paid) and one from Feb 2026 (accounting take-over, paid, partial refund discussed).
8
Resolve the recurring QuickBooks billing question ($125/account/month) — clarify what's been paid, by whom, and the date the client should take over billing directly.
9
Prepare a separate invoice for deal-advisory time — distinct from accounting/CapForge fees — covering time spent running the transaction generally and specifically drafting the Ryan Gnesin LOI (Aug–Sep 2025), for inclusion in the Timeline & Expense Memorandum.
Submitted By — Emanay Inc.
Alexandre R.J. Camus
Founder & Managing Director · Emanay Advisors
Date: August 19, 2026
Acknowledged By — Client
Dani Gergel
Owner · The Gergel Group, LLC
Date: ___________________